Quick, initial, but IMPORTANT, safety lessons from JAL 516
The accident JUST happened so expressing any conclusions would be premature speculation. The cover images of the JAL crash [above] suggest that the passengers escaping from the A350 onto the Haneda tarmac FOLLOWED THE SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS issued by the FLIGHT ATTENDANTS. Superficially this accident is a PRIMO example of two important safety lessons—
- that passengers MUST follow the instructions from their primary source of safety [Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA)];
And
- that an airline’s commitment to safety culture is not shown by nice posters and well-crafted policies, but how their first line safety professionals perform in emergencies!!!
Apologies for being redundant, but repetition is an effective pedagogical tool. Below is a list of posts on the subject of passengers carrying bagS:
- Reality Check on the Emergency Vacating of Aircraft Cabin (EVAC) Act
- Enough Thinking, Time to do something about Passengers carrying bags off in an emergency–
- Battle over FAA’s authority to regulate seat width/pitch; 90 seconds is a performance-based safety standard—
- All aboard saved- crashworthiness/flammability standards BIG PLUSES, credit due to passengers’ emergency evacuation adhering to No Bags Instruction–
- Representative “disappointed” with #FAA #CAMI that advances #aircraftevacuation #safety in 12 ways #EASA endorses BECAUSE it does not reach his unjustified “solution” #A4A #APA #AFA #ALPA http://jdasolutions.aero/blog/congressman-demands-faa-seat-safety-study-pitch-is-safe-plus-12-evacuation-recommendations-still-disappointed/
The images of passengers evacuating the aircraft unencumbered by any personal effects SHOULD BE THE HEADLINE PICTURE in general public media. The transition from walking away to a plane engulfed in flames with NO FATALITIES OR SERIOUS INJURIES would be SEARED IN THE MEMORY of every airline passenger. If some time in the future such a crisis is posed to those seeing this sequence, upon instruction from the cabin crew, she/he will STAND UP AND PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXIT.
The individual’s life is more valuable than any possession. NHTSA pays for Public Service ANNOUNCEMENTS about seat belts. The same media that broadcast those messages MUST HIGHLIGHT the JAL crash and the positive passenger outcome.
Reality will have greater impact on the traveling public than even the pictures used on board.
Second, as this story evolves, the professional action of the JAL safety professionals aboard this aircraft will highlight the level of the airline’s commitment to safety culture. Consider the conditions of the cabin- smoke, limited visibility, fear-terror about when/what/how this crash will become a disaster. The strength of the crew’s
commitment to their safety mission likely addressed the customers’ emotions and effectively communicated the precise actions to evacuate. Training and a sense of shared devotion to protecting the people trusting them must have prevailed.
Here is a seat map of the aircraft to give some dimension to the size of the challenge that these aviation safety professionals faced and were able to lead the safe exit of 379 souls.
This story is an important lesson for all of us in aviation as to the uniform devotion to a SAFETY CULTURE!!!
How did nobody die on the burning Japan Airlines plane? Modern safety features and great training.
Jan 2, 2024, 12:02 PM EST
A Japan Airlines crash collided with another plane while landing, bursting into flames on the runway. RICHARD A. BROOKS/ Getty Images
- A passenger plane and a Japanese Coast Guard aircraft collided at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport.
- An expert explained how all 379 people on board escaped, despite the plane bursting into flames.
- Plane safety features and Japan’s stringent training rules were key to averting disaster.
The terrifying footage of a Japan Airlines flight catching fire before landing at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport has left the world aghast.
Remarkably, ALL 379 PEOPLE ON BOARD SURVIVED after the Airbus A350 collided with a Japanese Coast Guard aircraft while trying to land.
Graham Braithwaite, an expert on flight safety at Cranfield University in the UK, told Business Insider that the design of the plane and high levels of staff training at the airline were likely key to averting disaster.
90 seconds to escape
Japan Airlines Flight 516 caught fire when landing in Tokyo’s Haneda airport on Tuesday night after colliding with a coast guard plane that was on its way to provide earthquake disaster relief.
Dramatic footage from inside the plane showed it filling with smoke as passengers evacuated, and news network video showed passengers going down an inflatable slide and running from the plane as flames engulfed the engine.
Shortly after, the plane was consumed by fire despite the efforts of firefighters to battle the blaze. Braithwaite said that under safety rules aircraft designers have to show that a plane can be evacuated in only 90 SECONDS with only 50% of exits available if there’s an accident. But, he said, this doesn’t account for the panic that sweeps a plane after an incident such as Tuesday’s, and the extra time vulnerable passengers, such as children and older people, need getting to safety. “Bear in mind that such tests do not take place in a high-stress environment (like today’s accident),” he remarked of the 90-second rule.
Under the circumstances, he said, the PERFORMANCE OF THE PLANE’S CREW in evacuating passengers was impressive, with no fatalities recorded and only 17 passengers suffering minor injuries. Five of those on board the Coast Guard plane were killed, and one person was seriously injured.
How the aircraft’s design helped
Emergency exit sign on airTran at Miami International Airport. Jeff Greenberg
A fire on board a plane has long been considered among the biggest threats to a plane’s safety, with aircraft powered by highly combustible fuel and a range of highly flammable materials on board. Braithwaite explained that plane cabins, such as that of the Airbus A350 involved in Tuesday’s accident, were designed with special materials to stop fire spreading rapidly and poisonous fumes being generated.
The 1985 Manchester Airport disaster, in which 55 people were killed when a British Airtours flight caught fire when taking off, had prompted a rethink of aircraft safety, he said. Planes now are designed so that emergency exits are easily accessible wherever you’re seated, and lights indicate their location in poor visibility conditions, such as when smoke spreads.
But luck also plays a part. Factors such as whether the aircraft fuselage was damaged in the accident, or the role played by firefighters in battling the flames likely bought passengers precious minutes as they made their escape, said Braithwaite.
A 2002 study found that pilots have around 17 minutes to land a plane safely if a fire is detected on board, so the fact that the passenger plane was already landing when Tuesday’s accident happened was an important factor in enabling people time to get out.
Japan Airlines’ rethink on safety
Braithwaite said that Japan Airlines has long had an “excellent” approach to passenger safety. “Their DEDICATION TO IMPROVING SAFETY is DEEP ROOTED in the organization and they have a VERY STRONG CULTURE of following standard operation procedures,” he explained.
A memorial for the 37th anniversary of the crash of Japan Airlines flight 123 which killed 520 people on board. STR
The worst single aircraft disaster in aviation history, when a Japan Airlines flight crashed into a mountain near Tokyo in 1985 killing 520 people, had prompted an intense focus on passenger safety at the company, he said.
He said that all staff at the company had to visit a SPECIAL AIR SAFETY CENTER at the airline’s HQ, where they’re taught the potential consequences of things going wrong, and how much work needs to go into getting passenger safety right.
“I think that the culture within JAL will have made a tremendous difference to the outcome of this tragic event,” he explained.
