JDA Solution - FAA Insight & Aviation Thought leadership on the Latest headlines.

Administrator Whitaker- Mr. Poole has great reasons for you to interject your technical experience into Remote Air Traffic Control Technology 

remote at facilities everywhere

Mr. Administrator, your experience with Next Gen and your work with automated aerial aircraft should provide adequate expertise to intervene into the FAA ATO’s Remote ACTC technical obstacles, as described by Robert Poole, Reason Foundation Director of Transportation Policy and Fellow. Below are citations to two of Mr. Poole’s analyses that conclude this advancement will maintain the highest levels of safety, reduce operational costs, and bring positive airspace control at airports which do not meet siting standards. Poole is THE foremost expert on policy, technology, economics, and costs on all matter of Air Traffic Control issues. Removal of the barriers to this innovation would be a signal of your commitment to technology as a means for enhancing safety.  


Another U.S. Remote Tower Project Loses Its Provider 

The Federal Aviation Administration’s UNPRECEDENTED 2023 CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS have led remote tower (RT) technology provider Searidge Technologies to pull the plug on continuing its five-year effort to help Colorado’s Department of Transportation (DOT) implement a remote/digital tower at Northern Colorado Regional Airport in Loveland. The same regulatory hurdles led Saab to discontinue its participation as the RT technology provider for the operational remote tower at Leesburg Airport in Virginia. COLORADO SOURCES SAY THEY INTEND TO CONTINUE WORKING ON THE PROJECT, WHICH BEGAN IN 2014; there are several other companies with certified remote towers operational in Europe, including Frequentis and Kongsburg. 

The bizarre situation facing U.S. airports that are good candidates for a remote/digital tower is the NEW CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS imposed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in March of this year (as I detailed in “FAA and Remote Towers: What’s Really Going On” in the May issue of this newsletter). Despite the fact that all four companies hoping to enter the U.S. remote tower market plan to use technology ALREADY CERTIFIED AND IN OPERATION in a growing number of countries (including GERMANY, NORWAY, SWEDEN, AND THE U.K.), in March FAA announced its certification plans. Any company seeking to install an RT system at a U.S. airport must install it first at the Atlantic City, NJ, airport where the FAA Tech Center is located. And they must allow Tech Center staff to reverse engineer the system over a three-year period in order to decide if it meets FAA certification requirements. 

While Leesburg has managed to keep in temporary operation a portable tower, the airport is unable to use the remote tower center that it had recently completed and which could have been used in future years to provide tower services to several other busy general aviation airports in Virginia. Instead, Leesburg officials plan to join the FAA contract tower program and hope to get federal funding to help build a brick-and-mortar tower. Loveland will continue to use a mobile control tower staffed by Serco controllers since the Searidge remote tower cannot be used. 

But there is some GOOD NEWS OUT OF COLORADO. The Loveland project team has had serious discussions with Raytheon {now Collins Aerospace)/Frequentis about taking over their RT project. Having a permanent tower will be important in securing scheduled airline service from interested parties such as Allegiant and Avelo. The airport is located near I-25 between Denver and Ft. Collins in one of the fastest-growing regions along the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains. 

A person familiar with the Loveland situation tells me that Raytheon/Frequentis has successfully completed the SDA (system design approval) intake process at FAA and will begin passive testing at the Tech Center in early 2024. Contrary to what was stated in FAA briefings back in March, after passive testing at the Tech Center, a vendor will not do active testing there because (it turns out) active testing is not allowed at Atlantic City International Airport, where the Tech Center is located. So, in order to become fully certified, active testing will take place at the airport where the project is located, in this case, Loveland. 

This is welcome news because, as originally briefed to the industry, the process would require three years at the Tech Center with the remote tower system installed there. Apparently, wiser heads prevailed, although this is too late for Saab and Searidge, whose years of effort at Leesburg and Loveland are down the drain. 

NEW FAA ADMINISTRATOR MICHAEL WHITAKER SHOULD REVIEW FAA POLICY ON REMOTE TOWERS. FAA has failed to implement Congress’s mandate in the 2018 reauthorization bill for FAA to have in place, by now, a five-airport remote tower pilot program; no such program exists. Congress might also eliminate the budget for FAA’s planned 31-airport “sustainable tower” program to build yet more architectural wonders at a time when the rest of the world is converting to ground-level remote towers. 


New vendor pitches plan to resurrect airport’s remote tower 

Dallas Heltzell 

LOVELAND — A subsidiary of the company formerly known as Raytheon told Northern Colorado Regional Airport (FNL) commissioners on Thursday that it would be excited to pick up operations of the airport’s experimental remote tower, which was left in limbo after a Canadian vendor pulled out last month. 

Rachel Jackson, director of strategy and customer engagement for Charlotte, North Carolina-based Collins Aerospace, a subsidiary of RTX Corp. (NYSE: RTX), the company which until July had been known as Raytheon Technologies, told commissioners that it has been developing the technology for several years using Raytheon’s Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS), already being used in many air-traffic control centers around the country. She said her company partnered with Frequentis, based in Vienna, Austria, to develop a remote-tower system and has won approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to test it at the FAA’s technology center in Atlantic City, New Jersey.  

Jackson told commissioners that she hoped to begin testing at the tech center in February, which could lead to STA (system design approval) by December 2024 or the first quarter of 2025 – “and then go to an active airport. 

“What we would like to do,” she said, “is to plan on ordering hardware and installing it here in Fort Collins before we get approval, so that the minute we are done through the tech center, we just move the team to Fort Collins.” 

The airport, jointly owned by the cities of Loveland and Fort Collins, is located within Loveland’s city limits. 

“We’d also be making sure you have an off-ramp,” Jackson added, “so that if we don’t get through STA, you are not on the hook to have to deal with that hardware and that equipment. We’d come and get it.” 

She expressed confidence that FAA approval could be won. “We want to treat this project like we do STARS,” she said, and would develop it with the “same rigor.” 

Bill Payne, president of William E. Payne and Associates, who the Colorado Department of Transportation’s aeronautics division has appointed as program manager for the project, was nearly as confident in Jackson’s team winning approval. 

Noting that airport commissioners had shown mounting frustration with delays in the remote-tower project and were beginning to consider construction of a traditional air-traffic control tower instead, Payne said that “during this process, the airport simultaneously will be going through a siting process to site a sticks-and-bricks tower” using the FAA’s Virtual Immersive Siting Tower Assessment system (VISTA). 

“The siting process will take approximately 24 months,” Payne said. “At any point, we will have an off ramp to go either way depending on what occurs at the tech center. But when you’re dealing with the FAA, all bets are off.” 

DOT, the FAA and the airport had been collaborating since 2015 to bring the technology to Northern Colorado. Through video cameras and other sensing technologies, the remote tower is designed to emulate the operational safety and efficiency benefits of a traditional control tower at a lower cost. 

David Ulane, director of CDOT’s aeronautics division, which has paid for much of the remote-tower testing at the airport, told the commission that “I know that you all are considering an alternate path and looking at options regarding a traditional air-traffic control tower as we continue to move the remote tower project forward, which is still our intent from CDOT’s perspective. We’re very excited about this technology, and these people are extremely interested in coming over to pick up where Searidge left off.” 

Nepean, Ontario-based Searidge Technologies, the company selected by the FAA in 2018 to be the tower’s technology partner, in October advised CDOT verbally and in writing to the FAA that it was pulling out over ongoing challenges with the remote certification of remote towers. New visibility requirements issued by the FAA in November 2022 triggered a halt in testing at the tower while new technology could be installed to meet the new standards. The FAA then extended the stop-work order for another six months. Searidge continued to work on upgrading the technology, but apparently wasn’t getting paid for its work by the FAA during the stop-work order. 

Payne reminded the panel that, “to develop a sticks-and-bricks or legacy traditional tower would be a minimum of at least five years” and could cost more than $65 million. 

“It would be a far shorter time to get through the technical center testing,” he said. 

“It would be a crying shame to take the work we’ve done here and simply throw it away,” he said. “I think the remote tower is the best solution here, and it gives the state a chance to do something extraordinary, which is set up a remote tower center to serve multiple airports.” 

Fort Collins mayor Jeni Arndt, who chaired Thursday’s meeting, sounded a note of caution. 

“Before we made any decisions, we would need to know what the FAA would put in,” she said, “because these are big-money decisions, and because WE DON’T HAVE A REMOTE TOWER UP IN THE UNITED STATES RIGHT NOW.” 

THE FAA EXPERIMENTED WITH A SIMILAR SYSTEM IN LEESBURG, VIRGINIA, BUT HALTED THAT PROJECT IN FEBRUARY. 

Payne said that if Jackson’s team were to withdraw from the project, “there is no remote tower contractor out there.” 

Along with construction of a larger terminal, which began in July, the airport needs air traffic control if it hopes to lure the return of scheduled airline service. 

Loveland had been represented by City Manager Steve Adams and Mayor Pro Tem Don Overcash, who had chaired the commission. Arndt chaired Thursday’s meeting instead because Overcash lost his bid to be mayor – and thus his City Council seat – in the Nov. 7 Loveland municipal election. 

Adams said the Loveland City Council would meet Nov. 28 to select members to the airport commission, including Overcash’s replacement. Loveland Mayor Jacki Marsh, who frequently has attended the meetings, told BizWest she would be interested in serving. 


Sandy Murdock

Sandy Murdock

Head writer, Sandy Murdock, was former FAA Chief Counsel and FAA Deputy Administrator. Also NBAA’s former Sr. VP Administration and General Counsel.

Share this article:

2 POSTS A DAY — OVER 2,500 ARTICLES

JDA Solutions Journal:
Daily Aviation Insight by FAA Experts

Published daily since 2009, the JDA Journal has earned a reputation as a source for concise, unbiased, no nonsense, non-jargon, in depth analysis and incisive commentary on the latest news and important current issues of interest to the aviation community. No other daily aviation journal is as thought provoking, insightful, interesting and sometimes even fun to read at no cost, without advertisements and without overt or subtle marketing messages.

JDA Journal is a forum for JDA Aviation staff and Associates to post their insights on aviation Safety.

Our head writer, Sandy Murdock, was former FAA Chief Counsel and FAA Deputy Administrator. Also NBAA’s former Sr. VP Administration and General Counsel.

Sandy Murdock 2023

Follow to read our articles here:

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

CATEGORIES

[taxopress_termsdisplay id="1"]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[seopress_breadcrumbs]