FAA’s new Flight Surgeon, Dr. Northrup, should read St. George’s excellent critique

FAA AME ATP medical form
Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

Qualified Critic finds faults within FAA Aerospace Medicine

Issues with Specific Policies and Practices

Points to SMS and RBDM to identify internal problems

FAS Dr. Northrup good “To Do” list

David St. George, SAFE Director, Master CFI (12X), FAA DPE, ATP (ME/SE) Currently jet charter captain, [1] has written a long and quite specific critique of the FAA’s Office of Aerospace Medicine, in particular its pilot medical certification office. Mr. St. George’s analysis of this function is all encompassing. His insights show a number of policies, though well-intended, result in outcomes contrary to aviation safety.

David St. George







On a more systematic level, St. George assesses the Flight Surgeon’s panoply of medical processes and policies based on  the Aviation Safety’s primary tools- Safety Management Systems and risk-based decision making (RBDM). These insights, this article, ought to be on the top of the new Flight Surgeon’s “to do” pile.


The FAA has a new, incredibly qualified Federal Air Surgeon, Dr. Susan E. Northrup, MD, MPH. Her career includes years of experience outside of the FAA. The Doctor has an exceptional education, incredible professional activities, performance awards and, perhaps most impressive to many in the aviation community, a PPL! That resume include work on preventive medicine, global PILOT entry testing standards and work for an airline with flight deck crews 100% ATP.


Aviation Ideas and Discussion!

Aviation Excellence: SAFE CFI-PRO™SAFE

The FAA Medical Mess

By David St. George

David St, George


“We have all seen pilot friends suffer through denials and endless expensive testing to retain or regain their flying privileges. Others have avoided doctors at their personal peril to maintain their flying status. On the other hand, some have just “passed” their FAA medical only to die suddenly from a heart attack.

Many pilots avoid medical procedures, therapy or necessary counseling just to maintain a “clean medicalDad history” and suffer daily. Our FAA medical system needs a full re-examination and overhaul. This article was written by a long-time FAA insider who has personally suffered through these issues and wishes to remain anonymous.

anonymousThe stated goal of the FAA’s medical certification system is to support safety by ensuring that those operating in the NAS are physically and mentally capable of performing their duties as pilots or controllers. However, the aeromedical system presently operates in a way that does not support this goal. On the contrary, it undermines safety because it strongly incentivizes “don’t tell/don’t treat” behavior among airmen.

In the words of one long-time aviator, pilots quickly learn never to conflate managing their FAA medical certificate with managing their actual health. The FAA medical system is widely perceived as capricious and punitive. Suggesting the existence of a medical condition to an AME or, worse, revealing anything requiring referral to Oklahoma City practically guarantees a deferral of unknown duration. Engagement with the FAA medical bureaucracy generally leads to a series of “because-we-said-so” demands for tests and procedures that are often expensive and almost never covered by insurance. In some cases, these tests are deemed irrelevant, unnecessary, or even harmful by the physician or specialist who knows most about both the condition and the airman.

The FAA justifies these demands in terms of “aerospace medicine.” These assertions are the subject of eye-rollingAME RXridicule in the aviation community. Pilots at every level (private to ATP) and in every city can easily name at least one “go-to” AME for the expeditious handling of FAA medical certification paperwork. The flying public would be shocked to learn that five-minute FAA medical “exams” are the norm, whether for private pilots, active air carrier pilots with first-class medical certificates, and even special issuance.

As the safety record demonstrates, though, cases of pilot incapacitation at the controls are exceedingly rare. Those unfamiliar with the reality described above might attribute this result to the “effectiveness” of the FAA’s medical certification system. The truth is that those who cannot use BasicMed – an alternative Congress mandated because of the known vagaries in the FAA system – engage in some form of “don’t tell/don’t treat” behavior. In the best cases, pilots work with a trusted personal physician to treat conditions they dare not reveal to the FAA. In the worst cases, pilots fearful of entangling with the agency’s medical bureaucracy simply avoid treating health conditions that could indeed lead to an accident or incident.

In terms of both process and the outcome, the FAA’s traditional medical certification system is clearly inconsistent with the agency’s Compliance Program, its focus on the use of Safety Management Systems (SMS), and its initiative for risk-based decision making (RBDM).

pilot medicalThe Compliance Program seeks to find problems and use the most effective means to fix them before they cause an accident or incident. It recognizes that in order to find and fix safety problems, there has to be an open and transparent exchange of information and data between the FAA and those who operate in the system. It recognizes that safety is not served by a system that incentivizes hiding problems to avoid punishment. In the case of medical certification, pilots currently have no incentive to do otherwise because they fear the punishment of costly and seemingly endless entanglement with a broken bureaucracy.

Open and transparent exchange of information, which is essential to achieving real safety, requires mutual cooperation and trust and “just culture” – a system in which self-disclosure is not punished.

Such trust is notably absent in the case of FAA medical certification, which is viewed as a punitive “gotcha” culture. The FAA medical staff, along with designated Aviation Medical Examiners who stand to lose substantial income, despise and openly disparage the BasicMed option as “unsafe.” In fact, however, the non-jeopardy nature of the BasicMed certification process is consistent with both the Compliance Program’s “find and fix” approach as well as with the concept of a just culture. As one BasicMed pilot puts it, “Now I can have an honest conversation with my doctor without worrying how the FAA will punish me.”

The operation of the FAA’s medical certification system is also inconsistent with the agency’s much-touted “risk-based decision making” strategic initiative (RBDM). RBDM holds that in order to truly improve safety, the agency needs to make smarter, system-level decisions that are based on data and risk analysis. The FAA medical certification system, by contrast, uses a one-size-fits-all approach. It seems to regard virtually any medical condition at any certificate level as a risk that requires significant time, energy, and resources by both the agency and the airman who has been foolish enough to report it. Meanwhile, actual risk increases because airmen whose work requires something beyond BasicMed patronize the five-minute “go-to” AMEs and/or practice some form of the “don’t tell/don’t treat” behavior described above.

As it currently operates, the FAA’s medical certification system also creates a substantial barrier to entry into the aviation workforce. For those considering an aviation career, a substantial investment of time and money is required to accumulate the 1,500 hours of flight time and the ATP certification level needed for employment in the industry. Those pondering whether to make such investments quickly become aware that even if they can qualify for issuance of an initial first- or second-class FAA medical certificate, they risk losing that certificate – along with the time and money already invested in training and logging flight time – every six months.

[1] Experience: Charter Pilot/Pilot Examiner (FAA);Owner/Manager–Chief Instructor. Education : University of Pennsylvania. Master’s Positive Psychology; Rochester Institute of Technology, BA. Licenses & certifications: FAA Designated Pilot Examiner 23-EA-82

doctor and pilot


Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

1 Comment on "FAA’s new Flight Surgeon, Dr. Northrup, should read St. George’s excellent critique"

  1. Sandy Murdock | March 20, 2021 at 5:25 pm | Reply

    The Air Up There Podcast
    Dr. Susan Northrup Makes Aviation History

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.