VDRP for Certificate Holders and violations of the drug and alcohol testing regulations explained—what’s the path for individuals

DRUG FAA Airline pilot random drug test
Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

Voluntary Disclosure Reporting Program Gets Extended to Drug and Alcohol Programs, Unless… 

How an FAA certificate holder can use VDRP- great advice

Where is FAA explanation for Certificate Employees’ path to EAP?


The Federal Aviation Administration relies heavily on voluntary compliance with its regulations. As part of its strategy, the FAA encourages regulated entities to participate in LR logovoluntary disclosure reporting programs (VDRP) to ensure that sporadic issues do not become systemic problems. The idea is that if an employer detects a problem and takes immediate, strong corrective action, the FAA will forgo issuing a civil penalty for the violation.

The FAA just recently issued a new Advisory Circular (AC 120-117) that details how regulated entities may take advantage of the VDRP for violations of the drug and alcohol testing regulations contained in 14 CFR Part 120. In order to qualify, the following conditions must be met:

  1. The FAA must be notified. The notification should be made within 24 hours and before the FAA learns of the apparent violation by other means.
  2. The violation must be inadvertent. The apparent violation was the result of inattention and did not result from a purposeful choice.
  3. The violation cannot reflect a lack of qualification. The apparent violation does not indicate a lack, or reasonable question of, an employer’s or contractor’s qualification to hold a certificate, letter of authorization, or program registration.
  4. Immediate action satisfactory to the FAA must be taken. The employer or contractor took immediate action upon discovery to terminate the conduct that resulted in the apparent violation.
  5. A comprehensive fix must be developed. The employer must develop a fix for the problem, establish a schedule for implementation, and put in place a system of self-audits to ensure the fix is effective.


drug testing

The AC provides details on the format for the submission and additional information that should be included, such as a description of the violations, an estimate for how long the problem has been ongoing, when and how it was discovered, verification that the non-compliance has stopped, and what was done to stop it.

After the initial disclosure is made and the FAA acknowledges receipt, the employer has 10 business days to submit the detailed description of the comprehensive fix and the schedule for implementation. The FAA will then make a determination whether to accept or reject the disclosure and issue a written decision stating the reasons for the action. If the submission is deficient and is rejected, the FAA can begin full enforcement proceedings against the persons involved.

The most important take away from the Advisory Circular is that when a problem is detected, time is of the essence. Any disclosure made more than 24 hours after it is discovered does not have to be accepted by the FAA, and the submission must have a detailed explanation for the delay to even be considered. As a result, it is of vital importance that all personnel in the company who are involved in compliance be aware of the VDRP and the actions that must be taken immediately to protect the company.

LeClairRyan – Mark McKinnon


While it is useful to know the clear path for a certificate holder to disclose an inadvertent error, it might be useful for the FAA to publish similar information for individuals: airmen, A&Ps/AMTs, flight attendants and others within the safety scope of the drug-testing scope.



⇒  Trump & Chao “Opioid Crisis” Announcements- Slow And Not Mention EAP, The Best Safety Strategy






⇒A Case Of A Pilot FUI — The Rules Caught Him; The System Might Have Done Better & Been Safer

drug -fui-faa-pilot

⇒  CBS eyes FAA’s exceptional pilot addiction recovery program success-HIMS







The drug testing system catches individuals who are in trouble. EAP and other similar intervention programs are preventative in nature. Mr. McKinnon did an excellent job of describing the VDRP process for the airline, Part 135, OEM, etc. It would appear appropriate that the FAA should give equal prominence for the path for individuals.


Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

Be the first to comment on "VDRP for Certificate Holders and violations of the drug and alcohol testing regulations explained—what’s the path for individuals"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.