Santa Monica’s Mayor lays on the Rhetoric about the battle with the FAA over the Airport

Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

The City of Santa Monica has waged a battle with the FAA for over 30 years about the closure of its airport. Originally known as Clover Field, the runway has been in the same place since 1919 (see below picture circa 1922) and the community has grown up around it.

m44

During the World Wars, the Douglas Aircraft Company located its headquarters there and was the site of the christening of many famous aircraft, including the Douglas World Cruiser[i] (pictured below). The first airplanes to fly around the world were built at the Douglas factory.

m33

[i] Journalism integrity disclosure: one of the pilots who flew this aircraft was a great uncle of the “author.”

That history is intended to explain how long SMO has been a part of the Santa Monica community. It’s not a recent addition and likely it’s a lot older than any of the residents who have subsequently moved to some location proximate to the airport. One may also reasonably assume that any rational buyer, who considered the purchase of a house in the environs of the City, would have noticed the existence of the airport.

At a level up from the home purchaser is the City Council, the Mayor and the Airport Manager. All are likely to have reviewed the FAA Grant Agreement, before receiving the $250,000 from the FAA in 2003. By executing that binding contract, the City became obligated to run the airport another 20 years, or until 2023. That twenty year extension is one of the terms of the standard agreement which every airport must sign in order to receive the federal funds. The City has hired very competent airport lawyers, who within the attorney-client privilege, have explained exactly what that means.

Santa Monica’s Mayor Kevin McKeown has made the following comments about the FAA:

  • “The City Council is readying a ‘new more assertive posture’ in its battle over the future of the Santa Monica Airport after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Friday delayed yet again a key decision on the matter.”
  • “We had a closed session meeting with our national aviation attorneys at our last meeting and have an airport action item regarding emissions on our October 27th agenda.”
  • He said he was also on a conference call last week to discuss the problem with Congressman Ted Lieu, whose 33rd Congressional District includes Santa Monica, and that the City continues to get “great support” from him.
  • “Santa Monicans are confronted with a federal agency that is refusing to do the work American taxpayers expect.”
  • “Our Congressman Ted Lieu is doing everything he can to assist, but the FAA is immovable, and, frankly, arrogant, in telling Westside residents concerned about their families’ health and safety that bureaucrats are just too unmotivated to provide a timely answer.”
  • “As I told the FAA in July when I visited DC, we will not be denied, we will not stop, and we truly believe that ultimately, we will prevail.”

That is not the rhetoric of someone who is confident in his legal case. Casting aspersions on the speediness of bureaucrats is typically a way to obfuscate the merits. His perceptions of the American taxpayers’ expectations may actually reflect his frustrations with the FAA’s staff following the mandates of Congress as to the Grant Program—dollars given for the promise that the airport will remain open for the agreed 20 year extension. The NATIONAL taxpayers expect when their dollars are spent there will be an enforceable quid pro quo, the extension.

m22

Rhetoric is in the DNA of Santa Monica. That Saint was born in 332 and gave birth to a son, named Augustine, St. Augustine. He studied law and taught rhetoric. In his scholarly work On Christian Doctrine, the Saint expounded on the art of his chosen academic study:

“For since through the art of rhetoric both truth and falsehood are pleaded, who would be so bold as to say that against falsehood, truth as regards its own defenders ought to stand unarmed, so that, forsooth, those who attempt to plead false causes know from the beginning how to make their audience well-disposed, attentive, docile, while the others remain ignorant of it; so that the former utter their lies concisely, clearly, with the appearance of truth, and the latter state the truth in a way that is wearisome to listen to, not clear to understand, and finally, not pleasant to believe…”

The City may be able to articulate strong compelling legal arguments, but hyperbole, even as crafted by the ancestors of St. Augustine or her mother, is not enough. Once again, a court will likely tell the City that a contract is a contract and the airport must remain open until 2023.

 

ARTICLE: Santa Monica Mayor Vows More “Assertive” Role in Battle with FAA

Share this article: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedin

2 Comments on "Santa Monica’s Mayor lays on the Rhetoric about the battle with the FAA over the Airport"

  1. Sandy, First of all, you are factually wrong on much of your information. The Clover Field runway is NOT in the same place since 1919. The runway has actually moved 2 more times. The original 1919 runway has long since been covered up by the Douglas factory and the current business park which has long since covered up ANY remnant of the original 1919 airport or runway.

    There are 178,000 people that live in the zip codes directly adjacent to the airport. While the original airfield may have existed before most of those homes were built, the vast majority of those homes were built BEFORE any private jets ever flew out of Santa Monica Airport. In fact, homes were condemned and demolished to make way for the current runway which has absolutely no runway safe areas on either end. Journalism integrity disclosure: I was born two blocks away from Santa Monica Airport long before a single private jet flew out of that airport.

    You have overly simplified the discussion of the 2003 FAA Grant Agreement. The details of how much money and when the money was taken is obviously disputed by the FAA but I suggest that you look at the actual contracts. The original amount of the grant is well below the amount that triggers a Grant Assurance. Additional funds were taken but no additional agreement was signed and finally the TOTAL amount appears to be just $0.01 shy of the required amount to trigger a Grant Assurance, no doubt so as NOT to trigger a Grant Assurance.

    No rhetoric, just the facts. You and the FAA may want to ignore them, but it most likely will be up to the courts to decide. Nevertheless, it is also true that other communities have simply repaid their Grant Assurances; had their Grant Assurance nullified by an act of Congress or as in the case of Chicago Meigs Field, just ignored them all together and paid them back (along with resulting fines) when they closed their airport.

    Finally also check on your details about Atlantic City International Airport. Since 1992 the South Jersey Transportation Authority has run the airport, not the FAA. It is currently managed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

  2. Thanks for your comments. Articulated persuasively, but I disagree. Yes, ACY is now operated by the PANYNJ, but the FAA has operated three airports in its history. ACY, IAD and DCA.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.