Those who embrace the SMS/compliance/consistency/the new Part 23 will succeed, and most importantly, long term aviation safety will be the ultimate beneficiary.Read More
The Cleveland Airport snow case poses many duplicative powers created by the agreement between the FAA Administrator and OSHA. The overlap of authority were guarantees of future issues.
SecurityIntelligence published the article “Five Whys: Lessons From the World of Incident Investigations” which may stimulate a discussion of what works in finding root causes in SMS.
The FAA has been working on Air Turbulence Injuries for years. By including SMS problem-solving, more immediate and more effective tactics might be created.
Increased participation in broader industry safety efforts would be a positive step on the data-driven path to making aviation even safer.
A survey on Transport Canada suggests their inspectors have not been fully trained. The FAA would be well advised to see what might have been done better.
Airworthiness Directive requirements that go beyond what may be justified does not increase the airline’s safety margin. The FAA should consider including the value of SMS in implementing ADs at each carrier.
Aircraft lessors could provide unique data to SMS and ASIAS, which would help understand the meta data and the solutions to the carrier’s unique problems.
The ultimate goal of the Safety Management System discipline is to proactively identify risks. Everyone in the organization must be actively involved in being aware of potential risks, identifying them to the SMS committee and investing in the solution selected.
How well is Part 117 being implemented? The SMS experience has shown that solutions designed to respond to a specific airline’s profile are preferable to many universal regulatory fixes. Maybe here, too?